On Photography, Cops Need To Get A Clue

On photography, cops need to get a clue: Column

We can’t expect privacy in public, but neither should police officers and public employees. Security cameras operated by the Department of Homeland Security are installed in front of a federal building in New York. (Photo: Mark Lennihan, AP)

Last week, Buzzfeed reporter Benny Johnson went to work on a list of the seven ugliest federal buildings in Washington, D.C.

But what he found was even uglier than the buildings: ignorant, heavy-handed law enforcement officers who told him —wrongly— that he couldn’t photograph the ugly architecture.

Johnson repeatedly confirmed with the media-relations folks at these agencies that it was OK for him to photograph the buildings —as it is for any member of the public— but word hadn’t filtered down to the guys with guns.

Johnson writes : "After I took this photo of a public walkway in front of the (Department of Energy) building, four armed guards surrounded me and my bike. I was ordered off my bicycle and told to hand over my camera. ‘Where is your identification? Why are you taking photos of our building?’ an officer asked me. I explained my role as a reporter and asked what rules I had broken. ‘You are suspicious, and we are in a post-9/11 world,’ he said. The four officers surrounded me right here, directly in front of the building entrance."

Here’s the thing: They had no authority to do this. It’s legal in America to take pictures of public buildings — and pretty much everything else.

Source: usatoday.com
0 Comments